megan's blog

Friday, September 08, 2006

What have we done?

Disclaimer: I have not put much thought into this topic yet. I want to read more and discuss more.

Last night i was sitting with Montague and we were discussing many things, as is many times the case with Montague. We were talking about a paper he has to write for his module and he brought up this topic. He talked about the social justice trend. (This was not the first time I have been exposed to this conversation, Brennan also shed light on this possibility before I came to KC) Anyway, I think many christians our age, especially those recieving theological education, especially from Olivet, are attempting to "break the mold" and become a "new kind of Christian". all this talk of the emergent church and community as our buzz word and especially social justice is really hot right now. GREAT. I do think it is important and I also have bought into this trend and mindset, but I have been holding back a little to be honest. Im scared that it is a trend. Im scared that if I sell all I have to the poor, I will find out that maybe I was wrong or missed the point somehow.
BUt back to the real issue. Montague said something that I had never thought of before. first of all, Christians that are on fire for social justice many times have the mindset that social justice in itself is Christianity. What we all have to consider is the fact that even the "secular world" is starting to notice the poor. Therefore there must be something more to Christianity than social justice. (I dont think I made that point very well and would love for montague or someone to comment and say it better.)
second, are we not somehow redefining holiness in our attempt to rebel against what mom and pop said holiness was? (read that again). OK let me try to elaborate. Back in the day, mainly I am speaking about the time when the Nazarene manual was published, the founders of our denomination looked at the social scene of the day and also at the group of people that they wanted to share the kingdom of God with and they defined holiness by what now seems like a do's and dont's list in order to make church a safe place for her members. This meant that the members decided they would not drink alcohol. They had seen the vicous cycle of alcoholism in themselves and their brothers and sisters and decided that by not taking part they were being strong for those that at times were weak and by not buying into the alcohol industry, they were keeping their money from supporting more alcoholism. this also meant that they stayed away from bars and other social scenes. (Some now argue that we need to be among all types of people and we need to go where they are, whcih may not be wrong to think, but lets not roll our eyes at our founders.) There are other examples such as dancing, but all pretty much have the same story. They looked at their convictions and made life decisions.

So what about us, how does this affect what we are doing today. Many young Nazarenes have turned their backs on some of the legalistic rules set forth by our forfathers. We can be found in bars and clubs and even.....movie theatres. To this I say...OK I get it, lets not follow rules for the sake of following rules. If someone has a drinking problem or struggles because of movies then I say lets be strong for our brother. I pray that nothing but Jesus has control over our lives, and we need to be accoutable to each other to strive for that goal, but if Im honest, thats not what our generation cares about. To us, like I said before, it is just a bunch of rules that we long to rebel against. so how are we going about this rebellion?' We look around the world, and we see what many other people see and that is hurtig and dying people. Eventually we ask the questions and we realize that we might beable to help. Maybe somehow we are the oppressors. Middle class america can do something, we think. So first of all, we make it a christian cause, and then we start building the structure. This is what it might look like to stop oppression. We buy fair trade, we dont dare shop at Walmart, we look for ways to "screw the man" and for heavens sake we do not buy corporate anything (namely starbucks). I applaud all efforts to stop oppression. I love every individual who makes the decision to live simply, and I think there is a reason that this is our cause, but we have to make sure that we realize that not everyone will experience God in this way. social justice is necessary for us to enter into crucifixion, and to help lead others into ressurection (Thank you Montague), but lets not get too carried away. Lets not rewrite the manual to say, thou shall not shop at walmart. Lets stay in converstaion with one another and do our part to live as Jesus without mandating what the christian life must look like.

I hope I articulated this somewhat well. and I hope its not something that everyone who reads this has already wrestled with and I am just the last person to think about it, but please respond if you have thoughts on this.

2 Comments:

Blogger Ryland said...

Christianity isn't just social justice as for many our fellow journers may want to advocate being the only distinction. However, its alot more then social justice.
The following of crucified, dead and ressurected Jesus is more then being one who againest social injustice, poverty, abortion, sexual sins of whatever it might be. It's calling of the Church to be reflecting image of Christ to ALL PEOPLE. Those who are blacks, whites, latinos, asians, arabic ,jews, gays, women and men, old and young. We can't just be about this new trend of "social justice" even though it is long overdue and we must give a damn about our fellow brothers and sisters who are being subjected to this horrible reality.

But I also believe if we allow social justice to be the only defining terminology of what it means to be a follower of jesus. We will have totally miss of what it means to be the reflection of God. It has to be more then that. It has to be a community of God that is concern about social welfare and personal welfare of ALL PEOPLE. God is in the business of doing both things and more.

This is not something new for us as body of believers to be in this tension of not being over zealous about social justice that it defies us, and yet not forgetting and speaking out againest horrible attrocties to neighbors.

I personally welcome this new tension. This means that we as Church can no longer runaway from it, but hopefully run to it with leading of Christ who constantly breaks down barriers and yet also will draw the line to signify his followers.

Megbow and to anyone who is reading... There are a couple books that come to my mind about this one is by Brian Mclaren, his book "Generous Orthodoxy" and the is by Hauerwas which is entitled " The peaceable Kingdom" I think both of those books might help you understand the calling of the community of God to be witness in this world.

Well peace out playa hata!!

-Rypie

9:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yo Megan, I wanna share on this subject, but I think I might be forgotten in the "old posts" and never read... so I hesitate to talk on here... but I will anyway, briefly.

I wrote a little paper on the subject of Social Justice and Holiness to send to the big boys in the church, mainly because I felt like nobody in the higher positions (especially in Africa, probably not true to you in KC) had any idea that our generation was emerging with this emergent church concept, this social justice mood and vibe. I wrote that the church needs to embrace ALL FIVE portions of their holiness definition, not just the moral and ethical purity part that we so often felt they embraced and preached to us when we were younger. The definition of holiness according to the Naz church involves love, ethical and moral purity, self control, compassion, and justice. Even back in the day, and especially back in the day, when the church came together, they came together for all give of those purposes and threw them into the definition.

By the responses I've received and conversations I'm now having with big-wigs like World Mission Prez Louie Bustle, NYI Prez Monte Cyr, and NTS Prez Ron Benefiel, I'm realizing that the church was indeed founded on the social justice principles that we think we're discovering today. The church just, to many nazars and all of our generation, has floated away from the compassion and justice part and has emphasized only the purity part. The church actually is starting to right the ship (and as you and Montague said so is the secular world), and I think that our "new kind of Christian" might soon become part of the larger definition of Nazareno.

It will take our speaking out though for those two forgotten portions of the definition, and it will require us not to forget the first three portions. The original Nazars actually had it right I think, each of those five portions, love, self control, purity, compassion, and justice, is important and should be equally emphasized. We lose out too if we sacrifice the first three for the last two.

I love you. If you read this, let me know. I'll send you the full paper I wrote. If I don't hear back from you, I'll facebook you or something. - jw

10:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home